Seems appropriate to give a brief update on the football topics I covered when I last blogged here (sorta) regularly 2 years ago.
Marouane Chamakh left Arsenal to go on loan to West Ham United for the 2012-2013 season. He’s now at Crystal Palace FC, where I hope he’ll have a resurgence (what can I say except I have a soft spot for this player). Also of note: he’s kept that delightful haircut I’m so fond of).
Arsene Wenger and his Arsenal team have bounced back something fierce since signing Mesut Ozil from Real Madrid last month. They’re topping their Champions League Group, and – shocker of shockers – they’re also atop the (admittedly young) Premier League table. Of course, between the time I wrote the post about the media going in on Arsenal and now, the media went in on Arsenal so much harder and more regularly. Now, though, things are looking up for the Gunners, so they’re forced to give grudging credit to Wenger, which amuses me.
My football fandom has expanded to include Everton – the team I’ve chosen to support in the Premier League. In a separate post, I’ll talk about how that happened, and it’ll be a really short one, because not that much thought went into it.
I’ve previously written about the fact that I don’t support any teams in the English – sorry – Barclays Premier League. Mostly, I enjoy the soap opera that comes as the season unfolds, and right now, followers of the Premier League cannot escape the soap opera that is Arsenal. Unlike most soaps, this one has no need of sex scandals and the like in light of Arsenal’s dire performances and player exoduses.
Watching this particular story unfold, I’ve noticed a few things getting on my nerves. For one thing, football pundits suffer from the same affliction as other media types where they refer to “the media” as if they’re not a part of it – e.g., “The media are calling for Arsene Wenger to be fired.” If folks want to call for Arsene Wenger to be fired from his post as Arsenal manager, that’s their prerogative, but can they at least own that opinion instead of hiding behind this nebulous “media” label? (Side note: I get that seeing Wenger fired might be cathartic for fans who blame him for the club’s woes and pundits who are frustrated at his perceived obliviousness and stubbornness, but on this topic, I ask the same question I always ask when calls start coming for a manager’s head: with whom would you replace AW? Frankly, given the bashing both the manager and the club are getting, who in their right mind would want the job? And if – as some have accused – Arsenal are a club lacking in ambition, what top-flight, elite manager could the club’s owners convince to take the job? This is my problem with the knee-jerk “fire Wenger” wailing. The wailers rarely think their complaints through to anything resembling a logical conclusion).
Also, I understand the urge to kick someone when he or she is down, but I am over the heaping of scorn on Arsenal, not because I’ve suddenly developed an attachment to the Gunners, but because it’s old, tired and unproductive.
What this boils down to for me is the replication of the same complaints I always have about news media in any discipline: lack of perspective, fixation on belaboring a single point (Arsenal are playing awfully now. We get it. Move on. Are there no other teams in world football to mock and bitch about?), and my personal favorite: incessant regurgitation of the same damn narrative by multiple sources. (This also was true of the “When will Fernando Torres score” nonsense and the just-concluded Cesc Fabregas Saga). Can someone offer this consumer of football news something beyond, “Arsenal are terrible; Wenger must go?” Because once you’ve read one column mocking Arsenal, you’ve kind of read them all.
If the media are there to provide unique and special insight into events (be they world events or sporting events), how special and unique can that insight be when everyone essentially says the same thing?